Lords warn BBC duties need funding or trade-offs in 2028 Charter
UK Parliament / House of Lords Press Office
government
Time for a “bold, confident and unapologetic” approach to future of the BBC – Lords Communications Committee
UK Parliament Committees
government
Letter from the Chair to Rt Hon Lisa Nandy MP, Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, dated 18 September 2026
House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee
government
Policy letter on the BBC Charter Review
Untracked bias
100% of tracked sources are High factuality
Bias and factuality ratings from Media Bias Fact Check. Outlets without a rating are marked “Untracked.”
Funding warning
Peers said any new BBC duties in the next Charter must come with adequate funding or clear trade-offs.
£500m savings
The committee cited the BBC’s plan to save £500 million over the next two to three years as context for Charter decisions.
Platform backstop
The Lords urged minimum terms for deals with major video-sharing platforms, backed by legislation if voluntary agreements fail.
The Government is facing fresh parliamentary pressure to explain how it would fund any expanded remit for the BBC in the next Royal Charter, after the House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee warned that ministers cannot keep adding obligations without providing new resources or making explicit cuts elsewhere.1
In a letter sent to Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy on 18 September, ahead of the Government’s expected BBC Charter Review White Paper, the committee said the 2028 Charter should not be treated as a routine renewal. Peers argued that the BBC is entering a Charter period shaped by falling linear television reach, growing dependence on global technology platforms and unresolved questions over the long-term funding of public service media.4
The committee’s central challenge to DCMS is fiscal and political: if ministers want the BBC to do more on regional growth, skills, technological innovation or media literacy, they must either provide adequate funding or accept that the corporation will have to do less elsewhere.1 The letter notes that the BBC is already seeking £500 million of savings over the next two to three years, creating what peers describe as a credibility test for any new Charter obligations.4
The correspondence, formally published by Parliament at 06:00 on 18 September as part of the committee’s BBC Charter Renewal work, asks Nandy to respond within one month.3 That timetable puts the committee’s recommendations directly in the path of the Government’s forthcoming White Paper, expected later in 2026.4
The committee said the BBC’s next settlement must be backed by a “bold, confident and unapologetic” approach to long-term financial sustainability, a phrase also used in the Lords’ public notice announcing the letter.1 The warning is sharper than the rhetoric: peers are telling ministers that Charter reform cannot be separated from funding choices.
The letter does not endorse a specific funding model. Instead, it sets a condition for the White Paper: any expanded duties should be matched by resources, or by a transparent explanation of the trade-offs the BBC will need to make.4
That matters because the Government has been considering whether the BBC should take on stronger roles in areas such as regional economic development, media literacy, workforce skills and research and development. The committee said those ideas may have merit, but warned that unfunded obligations risk weakening the BBC’s core public service mission.4
Peers were particularly cautious about creating a broad new public purpose requiring the BBC to drive economic growth across the UK. The committee said the broadcaster already makes a major contribution to the creative economy, and that a standalone growth duty could distort commissioning priorities toward more commercial or exportable programming rather than distinct UK public service content.1
Instead, the committee recommended retaining the spirit of the BBC’s current fourth public purpose — serving and representing the UK’s nations and regions while supporting the creative economy — while stating more clearly the BBC’s role in developing creative industries.4
The committee also put down a marker on the BBC’s relationship with global video-sharing platforms, including YouTube. Peers accepted that the BBC increasingly needs to distribute content through third-party platforms to maintain universality, particularly as younger audiences move away from broadcast television.4
But they warned that reach comes at the cost of control. Distribution through major platforms can leave public service media dependent on recommendation systems, presentation rules, data access and commercial terms set by international technology companies.4
The committee urged the Government to set clear minimum expectations for agreements between public service media providers and major video-sharing platforms. Those expectations should cover prominence, data access, accountability and fair value, and should be backed by legislation if voluntary arrangements do not produce adequate results.1
That recommendation is likely to be among the most significant policy signals in the letter. It pushes DCMS beyond a BBC-only settlement and toward a wider platform-regulation question: whether Parliament should intervene if the BBC and other public service media providers cannot secure adequate visibility and commercial terms from global platforms.
The Lords’ intervention reflects a market shift documented in the letter. In 2015, broadcast television reached 92% of people in the UK each week. By 2025, weekly reach for live and recorded television had fallen to 54%. Over the same period, subscription video-on-demand and video-sharing platforms became mainstream parts of viewing habits, especially among younger audiences.4
The current BBC Royal Charter expires on 31 December 2027, and the next Charter is due to shape the broadcaster’s mission, governance, regulation and funding from 2028.4 The committee argued that this renewal cannot be designed in isolation from wider decisions on public service media prominence, distribution and platform regulation.4
Peers also linked the BBC Charter Review to the Government’s broader media policy work, including its “Watch this Space” agenda. The committee said the BBC remains a critical national and global institution, but one operating in a more platform-dominated market than when the current Charter was agreed in 2016.4
The letter also supports stronger collaboration across public service media, including partnerships on distribution, data, skills and artificial intelligence. It welcomed the BBC’s proposal to open iPlayer to trusted partners, potentially including Channel 4, while warning that collaboration should not undermine plurality, standards or competition.4
For ministers, the immediate question is how much of the Lords’ agenda will appear in the White Paper. The committee is not merely defending the BBC’s current position; it is asking DCMS to make explicit choices between expanding the corporation’s remit, funding those ambitions and regulating the technology platforms that increasingly mediate access to audiences.
If the Government accepts the committee’s logic, the White Paper will need to address three linked issues: what the BBC is for in the next decade, how those duties will be paid for, and what statutory tools may be needed if global platforms do not offer public service media acceptable terms.
If ministers reject or sidestep those recommendations, the Charter process is likely to face further scrutiny in Parliament. The committee has already set its marker: the 2028 settlement should be judged not only by what it asks of the BBC, but by whether the Government provides the funding and regulatory framework to make those demands deliverable.
The Justice Department says it will not criminally enforce a 1968 federal restriction on licensed dealers selling handguns to adults ages 18 to 20 after an internal legal opinion deemed the statute unconstitutional. The move does not strike down the law, but it shifts federal enforcement policy and could reshape active Second Amendment litigation.
President Trump said he would bar CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House over coverage he deemed unfavorable, but multiple reports found no immediate sign the threat had been carried out. The episode sharpens questions over presidential control of press access, viewpoint retaliation and ongoing litigation over Associated Press access to White House events.
China says the upgraded China-ASEAN free trade pact has been signed and is moving through legal procedures toward entry into force. The agreement gives Beijing a concrete economic framework for deepening regional ties in digital trade, green development, standards and connectivity as Southeast Asian governments manage wider Indo-Pacific alignments.
At an SCO ministers’ meeting in Dushanbe, India framed economic cooperation around trusted connectivity, customs simplification, resilient supply chains and WTO-centred rules. The stance signals New Delhi’s effort to shape the China- and Russia-heavy forum as a venue for market access and supply-chain security after the Modi-Xi thaw.
BBC Royal Charter
The constitutional document that sets the BBC’s mission, public purposes, governance, regulation and funding framework. The current Charter expires on 31 December 2027.
Public service media
Media services intended to serve public purposes such as impartial news, education, cultural representation and universal access, rather than only commercial objectives.
Prominence
Rules or agreements that determine how easily audiences can find public service content on platforms, connected TVs, apps or other digital interfaces.
Legislative backstop
A reserve power for Parliament or ministers to impose legal requirements if voluntary agreements between broadcasters and platforms are judged insufficient.
Comments